Naturalization Litigation
Naturalization lawsuits are a narrow area of immigration law. Two statutes that come up frequently are
8 U.S.C. § 1447(b) (certain delays after the naturalization interview) and
8 U.S.C. § 1421(c) (judicial review of certain denials after the required administrative steps).
If you want the broader overview (mandamus, habeas, and naturalization litigation), start here:
Federal Immigration Litigation.
Two Common Naturalization Lawsuit Pathways
8 U.S.C. § 1447(b)
Used in certain situations when USCIS fails to make a decision within the time allowed after the naturalization interview.
The remedy and best strategy depend on posture and record quality.
8 U.S.C. § 1421(c)
Used to seek federal-court review of certain naturalization denials after the required administrative review steps are completed.
These cases often turn on evidence and the reasons stated in the denial.
Timing and posture are everything
Whether you can file depends on exact dates, what has (and has not) happened in your case, and what documents are already in the record.
What I Review Before Recommending Naturalization Litigation
  • Interview date, notice(s), and what occurred at the interview
  • Any RFE/continuance request and your response(s)
  • Denial decision (if applicable) and the stated grounds
  • Administrative review/appeal posture and dates (if applicable)
  • Key background facts that affect eligibility (travel, taxes, prior arrests/charges, immigration history)
  • Your documentary record (what USCIS already has vs. what is missing)
For selected case examples and verification guidance, see:
Litigation Experience.
Some naturalization problems are solved faster (and more safely) through targeted evidence and administrative strategy.
Others require federal court. I can help you identify which lane you are in and the risks of each approach.

Free Consultation

Send Message Below

    Immigration News & Info

    Last Updated on February 7, 2026 by JR