A federal judge in Texas is holding up the expanded DACA and DAPA process. The USCIS will not be taking applications for the expanded program at this time. Better hold on to your forms if you were going to send them in. Talk to an immigration attorney before filing anything!
According to The Hill,
Dems are going to push forward on a nationwide effort to enroll immigrants in President Obama’s new programs:
Undaunted by GOP efforts to undo President Obama’s executive order to halt deportations, House Democrats have launched a national campaign to get the millions of eligible illegal immigrants signed up.
Spearheaded by Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D-Ill.), the multi-city effort will unite lawmakers, faith-based institutions and other community leaders working to help participants through the application process and over other bureaucratic hurdles.
As always, discuss your immigration issue with an immigration attorney before you file anything!
On November 20, 2014, President Barack Obama announced an expansion of the deferred action program to include parents of US citizen and permanent resident children.
What I know about the process as it stands is as follows. The applicant must:
– have, on November 20, 2014, a son or daughter who is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident;
– have continuously resident in the U.S since before January 1, 2010;
– who are physically present in the U.S. on November 20, 2014, and at the time of making a request for consideration of deferred action with the USCIS;
– have no lawful status on November 20, 2014;
– are not an enforcement priority as reflected in the November 20, 2014 (see November 20, 2014, Policies for the Apprehension, Detention and Removal of Undocumented Immigrants Memorandum); and
– present no other factors that, in the exercise of discretion, makes the grant of deferred action inappropriate. (See, November 20, 2014, Prosecutorial Discretion Memorandum).
How and when the process will be implemented and how much it costs remains to be seen.
I’ll update the process as more information becomes known.
The USCIS has is aware that some attorneys and applicants have been receiving two biometrics appointments. The USCIS suggests that if you have more than one ASC notice attend only one appointment, take both ASC appointment notices, and notify the ASC staff of of the two appointments and all form types requiring biometric appointments.
If the applicant client has already attended an ASC appointment and receives a duplicate notice, they should respond to the second notice in writing stating biometrics were already taken (including a copy of the stamped earlier notice) and requesting USCIS schedule a new appointment only if required.
The always warm and gentle agency known as ICE recently announced they are opening a “residential center” for women and children who have fled their countries. It’s cute that they’re calling it a residential center. It’s like calling a supermax prison a 5 star hotel. What ICE calls a residential center is actually a family prison intended to punish mothers and children for fleeing horrific violence in their home countries. ICE states that one of the reasons they’re imprisoning women and children is to deter other women and children from fleeing their countries. So this place is going to have to be awfully bad to deter someone fleeing death squads in their home country. Considering the sexual assaults, abuse, and death in ICE facilities I’m sure they’ll have no trouble making this place a house of horrors for women and kids. Congratulations ICE and the Obama administration. You’re today’s worst people in the world.
First, if it’s a bona fide marriage then congratulations! So, you get a green card no matter what right?! Though that seems to be a common belief it’s untrue.
An immigrant who marries a US citizen might be able to get a green card but there are a variety of conditions that must be met before an intending immigrant can be the beneficiary of an immigrant petition filed by a US citizen.
Generally speaking two things have to be true.
1. The marriage must be real and not entered in to for the purpose of evading immigration laws or solely for the purpose of gaining immigration benefits.
How do you prove that? Well basically the USCIS looks to evidence of a shared life together. They look for shared assets and liabilities and also that you held yourself out to the public as a real couple. The USCIS likes to see joint bank accounts, insurance, utilities, cars, houses, life insurance, credit cards, etc.. They also like to see evidence of travel and evidence that you spent time together with family or friends. Pictures are very useful to show travel and time spent with others. A couple of selfies at a location a few blocks from the immigration office aren’t going to be sufficient. Though there is no exact test of how much you need, more is better. Err on the side of bringing everything you have rather than too little. You have 30 minutes to convince a random USCIS officer who sees dozens of cases a day that you’re a real couple or they’ll devastate your life by trying to remove you after they deny your case.
2. The immigrant must also be “admissible”.
Even if the relationship is real, if you’re not admissible then you’ll get denied. A lot of things can render you inadmissible.
In no particular order here what I’ve found to be the most common problems.
A. Criminal offenses. Call a lawyer. Seriously. If you have criminal issues call a lawyer before you ever file anything.
B. Entered without inspection or overstaying a visa. A very common problem. Generally, if you entered without inspection you are unable to file for a green card even if you have a bona fide marriage to a US citizen. There is 1 exception. If you were here before December 2000 AND someone filed an I-130 for you (or an employer filed a labor certification for you) before April 30, 2001 AND it was approvable when filed (even if later denied) you can pay a $1000.00 penalty fee and still get a green card.
Everyone else is out of luck unless Congress gets their act together and passes immigration reform.
If you entered without inspection call a lawyer before you file anything.
If you entered on a visa (other than a J or crew visa) you will likely be able to get your green card as you were inspected by immigration when you arrived.
Again, call a lawyer.
C. US citizen doesn’t make a lot of money. Check the I-864P for the exact amount that the petitioner has to make. You can get a joint sponsor if the petitioner doesn’t make enough. It has to be a citizen or permanent resident and you’ll need their taxes and proof of status. You need to get this squared away before you file or you risk a denial.
D. Exit or removal and then reentry without inspection.
You could be barred from becoming a resident forever and risk prison. Call a lawyer.
There are a variety of other issues that could lead to denial. The inadmissibility grounds are found in section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act if you want to take a look. I always advise leaving it to the professionals though.
In other words, call a lawyer.
USCIS video about the new N-400 form. These editions are currently acceptable. 09/13/13. (USCIS will accept editions dated 03/22/12; 06/17/11; 01/18/11; 11/23/10; 04/05/10; 01/15/10 and 01/22/09 until Friday, May 2, 2014. Starting Monday, May 5, 2014, USCIS will only accept the 09/13/13 edition.)
The State Department is changing the TN rules for citizens of Mexico bringing them in line with the process that Canadians can utilize. The TN process for citizens of Mexico used to require an approved petition from the USCIS which is costly and time consuming process and also different than what Canadians had to do to acquire TN status. Canadians merely have to present their TN petition at a port-of-entry and it can be approved right there. The State Department is finally eliminating the disparity and allowing citizens of Mexico to do the same.
Had to write something about this because it touches on so much of what we immigration attorneys deal with on a daily basis – just not for famous people.
Justin Bieber has been having quite a lot of run-ins with the law right now. There is the vandalism issue in LA (but it’s not even clear that he will be charged). There is the drag racing, marijuana, Xanax issue fom Florida but it isn’t clear that will lead to any conviction either. He did test positive for marijuana and Xanax and appears to admit using both. And most recently he was charged with assault in Canada.
As far as I can tell Bieber is on a non-immigrant O-1 visa based on his extraordinary ability as a musician. It’s possible he has permanent residency through an EB1 petition based on the same. Not sure which one and it does make a difference when it comes to his ability to re-enter the US if the government gives him a hard time about these criminal issues.
Does any of this impact his ability to stay in or return to the United States?
As an initial matter it’s important to note that he has not been convicted on any of the charges nor did he plead guilty to any of them. Generally speaking it isn’t the charge that is the problem it’s the conviction. A guilty plea is a conviction for the purposes of immigration law. Usually a plea agreement results in a lesser charge so even the charges he has now may be modified downward becoming less serious offenses. He did, however, admit to drug use, which could be a problem independent of any conviction as we’ll see below.
Taking them one at a time…
Bieber has been accused of causing 20K in damage to his neighbors property by throwing eggs at it. As noted above the police don’t have a smoking gun but let’s assume he was charged with the offense. The options are either felony vandalism under or misdemeanor vandalism under P.C.§594.
Assuming it’s a felony it would not be what’s considered an aggravated felony under 8 USC 237 as it’s not a crime of violence. It would not be an offense under which he could be deported if he were in the US.
It becomes more complicated if he were convicted of a felony and then went outside the US. Because of the alleged amount of damage it might be considered a “crime involving moral turpitude” (CIMT) and if he got a jail sentence (probation doesn’t matter) of more than 6 months (even if the jail time was suspended) he would be “inadmissible” and be barred from coming back to the U.S. until he applied for, and received, a “waiver” of the bar to his admission.
If it’s a misdemeanor and he gets less than 6 months it would be a “petty offense” even if considered a CIMT and he would be admissible (and also would not get deported [by the way, removed is the proper term now])
Drag racing, drugs, resisting arrest..
Not concerned with the drag racing. Wouldn’t even be a CIMT as far as I can tell.
Not concerned about the resisting arrest without violence. Wouldn’t even be a CIMT as far as I can tell.
Concerned about the drugs and the admission of drug use. Under section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act admitting the essential elements of a controlled substance violation is sufficient, even absent a conviction, to be deemed inadmissible to the United States [See Pazcoguin v. Radcliffe, 292 F.3d 1209]. Marijuana use is a controlled substance violation. So if he’s convicted of drug use or admits to it’s use I could see that turning into a big deal. Maybe if he admitted smoking in Colorado it’d be no big deal but it’s still illegal in Florida as far as I’m aware and that could be a big problem for him in the future if the USCIS/ICE/CBP decides to go after him for something.
Don’t forget Amy Winehouse was banned from the US because of her drug problems…
He has returned to Canada to face charges of assaulting a limo driver. A lot is unknown here but it looks like it would be a common assault a worst which has a maximum 6 month penalty and 5000 dollar fine.
Assault can be considered a “crime involving moral turpitude” but there is plenty of case law that suggests a simple assault does not meet that standard. Additionally, since the maximum penalty is 6 months incarceration it would be considered a petty offense and not render Bieber inadmissible.
However, if he was convicted of assault and it was viewed as a CIMT AND he was convicted of vandalism AND it was considered a CIMT not only would be be removable if in the US he’d be inadmissible if he was outside of the US and again he would need a waiver.
If he’s on a non-immigrant visa a waiver is under 8 USC 212(d)(3) and is pretty straightforward. If he’s already a permanent resident he has to show extreme hardship to a US citizen spouse or child and that he cannot do. So this could all be worse for him if he already has a green card or seeks one in the future.
At this point he hasn’t been convicted of anything and my biggest concern for him would be the admission of drug use. That’s a big no-no under immigration law.
How this plays out remains to be seen but if he gets convicted I’ll update accordingly.